Premium
Implementation of quality of life monitoring in Dutch routine care of adolescents with type 1 diabetes: appreciated but difficult
Author(s) -
Eilander Minke,
de Wit Maartje,
Rotteveel Joost,
Maasvan Schaaijk Nienke,
RoeleveldVersteegh Angelique,
Snoek Frank
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pediatric diabetes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.678
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1399-5448
pISSN - 1399-543X
DOI - 10.1111/pedi.12237
Subject(s) - medicine , type 1 diabetes , family medicine , quality of life (healthcare) , set (abstract data type) , quality (philosophy) , diabetes mellitus , logistic regression , nursing , gerontology , philosophy , epistemology , computer science , programming language , endocrinology
Objective Monitoring quality of life (QoL) improves well‐being and care satisfaction of adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We set out to evaluate the implementation of the program DAWN (Diabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs) MIND ‐Youth (Monitoring Individual Needs in Young People With Diabetes) ( DM ‐Y), in which Dutch adolescents' QoL is assessed with the MIND Youth Questionnaire ( MY ‐Q) and its outcomes are discussed. Successful implementation of DM ‐Y warrants close study of experienced barriers and facilitators as experienced by diabetes care teams as well as adolescents and parents. Methods The study was conducted in 11 self‐selected Dutch pediatric diabetes clinics. A mixed methods approach was used. Ten diabetes teams (26 members) were interviewed; 36 team members, 29 adolescents, and 66 parents completed an online survey. Results Two of 10 teams successfully implemented DM ‐Y. Whereas 92% of teams valued DM ‐Y as a useful addition to routine care, most clinics were not able to continue because of logistical problems (lack of time and manpower). Still, all teams had the ambition to make DM ‐Y integral part of routine care in the nearby future. Seventy‐nine percentage of the parents and 41% of the adolescents appreciated the usage of MY ‐Q, same percentage of adolescents neutral. Conclusions DM ‐Y is highly appreciated by teams, as well as adolescents and parents, but for most clinics it is difficult to implement. More effort should be paid to resolve logistic problems in order to facilitate dissemination of DM ‐Y in care nationwide.