Premium
CD 80 expression and infiltrating regulatory T cells in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome of childhood
Author(s) -
Eroglu Fehime Kara,
Orhan Diclehan,
İnözü Mihriban,
Duzova Ali,
Gulhan Bora,
Ozaltin Fatih,
Topaloglu Rezan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pediatrics international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.49
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1442-200X
pISSN - 1328-8067
DOI - 10.1111/ped.14005
Subject(s) - medicine , focal segmental glomerulosclerosis , immunohistochemistry , nephrotic syndrome , minimal change disease , antibody , pathology , biopsy , renal biopsy , antigen , pathogenesis , staining , glomerulosclerosis , kidney , glomerulonephritis , immunology , proteinuria
Background CD 80 (also known as B7‐1) is a co‐stimulatory molecule that is expressed in biopsies and also excreted in urine in patients with minimal change disease ( MCD ) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis ( FSGS ). CD 80 is inhibited by the cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated‐antigen 4 ( CTLA 4), which is mainly expressed on regulatory T cells (Tregs). Ineffective circulating Treg response is involved in the pathogenesis of nephrotic syndrome. In this study, we evaluated CD 80 expression and infiltrating Tregs in children with MCD and FSGS . Methods Evaluation of CD 80 expression and semi‐quantitative evaluation of Tregs ( FOXP 3‐positive CD 4 T cells) were carried out in 31 kidney biopsies (12 MCD , 19 FSGS ) with immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry staining. Results All MCD sections were stained negative; whereas six out of 19 FSGS sections (all from steroid‐resistant ( SR ) patients), including one from a Wilms' tumor 1 ( WT 1) mutation‐positive FSGS patient, stained positive for anti‐ CD 80 goat antibody, and negative for anti‐ CD 80 rabbit antibody. FSGS biopsy specimens had significantly higher FOXP 3‐positive cells/mm 2 compared with MCD and control samples ( P < 0.001). Biopsy samples from SR ‐ FSGS patients ( n = 12) with positive CD 80 staining ( n = 6) had significantly less Tregs ( FOXP 3‐positive CD 4 T cells) compared with CD 80 (−) biopsies ( n = 6; P = 0.004). Conclusion CD 80 expression was not detected in the majority of the archival biopsy sections and the results were not consistent across the different antibodies. In the SR ‐ FSGS sections, however, CD 80‐positive biopsies had decreased FOXP 3‐positive CD 4 T cells, suggesting that a decreased anti‐inflammatory milieu may be the cause of increased CD 80 expression.