z-logo
Premium
Comparison of fluid leakage from four different cuffed pediatric endotracheal tubes using a pediatric airway simulation model
Author(s) -
Komasawa Nobuyasu,
Fujiwara Shunsuke,
Miyazaki Shinichiro,
Soen Masako,
Minami Toshiaki
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
pediatrics international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.49
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1442-200X
pISSN - 1328-8067
DOI - 10.1111/ped.12373
Subject(s) - medicine , cuff , endotracheal tube , airway , volume (thermodynamics) , anesthesia , leakage (economics) , intubation , surgery , physics , quantum mechanics , economics , macroeconomics
This study used an airway model to compare the ability of a pediatric endotracheal tube with a taper‐shaped cuff to prevent microaspiration relative to endotracheal tubes with conventional cuffs. Four different types of 5.0‐mm inner diameter cuffed pediatric endotracheal tubes (taper‐shaped cuff [ T aper], high‐volume low‐pressure [ Hi ‐ Lo ], middle‐volume low‐pressure [Intermediate], and low‐volume low‐profile [ Lo ‐ Pro ]) were fixed within vertically placed acrylic tubes. The cuffs were maintained at 10, 20, or 30 cmH 2 O pressure and 3 mL of simulated stomach contents was added to the top of the cuffs. The volume of leakage around the cuffs after 5 min and 4 h was measured. After 5 min, the volume of leakage was significantly lower with the Taper than with the Hi ‐ Lo , Intermediate, or Lo ‐ Pro at all pressure settings. After 4 h, leakage was significantly lower with the Taper than with the other three tubes regardless of initial cuff pressure ( P < 0.05).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom