Premium
National strategy for suicide prevention in J apan: Impact of a national fund on progress of developing systems for suicide prevention and implementing initiatives among local authorities
Author(s) -
Nakanishi Miharu,
Yamauchi Takashi,
Takeshima Tadashi
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.609
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1440-1819
pISSN - 1323-1316
DOI - 10.1111/pcn.12222
Subject(s) - local community , cabinet (room) , local government , suicide prevention , workforce , public relations , medicine , business , poison control , environmental health , political science , public administration , engineering , mechanical engineering , law
Aim In J apan, the Cabinet Office released the ‘General Principles of Suicide Prevention Policy’ in 2007 and suggested nine initiatives. In 2009, a national fund was launched to help prefectures (the administrative divisions of J apan) and local authorities implement five categories of suicide‐prevention programs. This paper examines the impact of the national fund on the establishment of the systems for suicide prevention and the implementation of these initiatives among local authorities. Methods The present study included 1385 local authorities (79.5%) from all 47 prefectures that responded to the cross‐sectional questionnaire survey. Results Improved suicide‐prevention systems and the implementation of nine initiatives in A pril 2013 were observed among 265 local authorities (19.1%) that implemented ‘Training of community service providers’ and ‘Public awareness campaigns’; 178 local authorities (12.9%) that implemented ‘Face‐to‐face counseling’, ‘Training of community service providers’ and ‘Public awareness campaigns’; and 324 local authorities (23.4%) that implemented ‘Trauma‐informed policies and practices’. There was no significant difference in suicide‐prevention systems and the implementation of nine initiatives between 203 local authorities (14.7%) that implemented only ‘Public awareness campaigns’ and 231 local authorities (16.7%) that did not implement any suicide‐prevention programs. Conclusion The results of our study suggest that the national fund promoted the establishment of community systems for suicide prevention and helped implement initiatives among local authorities. The national suicide‐prevention strategy in J apan should explore a standard package of programs to guide community suicide‐prevention efforts with a sustained workforce among local authorities.