Premium
Persistent negative temperature response of mesophyll conductance in red raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.) leaves under both high and low vapour pressure deficits: a role for abscisic acid?
Author(s) -
Qiu Changpeng,
Ethier Gilbert,
Pepin Steeve,
Dubé Pascal,
Desjardins Yves,
Gosselin André
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/pce.12997
Subject(s) - rubus , vapour pressure deficit , abscisic acid , stomatal conductance , blowing a raspberry , diurnal temperature variation , horticulture , botany , rosaceae , conductance , transpiration , ecophysiology , chemistry , biology , photosynthesis , meteorology , biochemistry , gene , physics , mathematics , combinatorics
The temperature dependence of mesophyll conductance ( g m ) was measured in well‐watered red raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.) plants acclimated to leaf‐to‐air vapour pressure deficit (VPDL) daytime differentials of contrasting amplitude, keeping a fixed diurnal leaf temperature ( T leaf ) rise from 20 to 35 °C. Contrary to the great majority of g m temperature responses published to date, we found a pronounced reduction of g m with increasing T leaf irrespective of leaf chamber O 2 level and diurnal VPDL regime. Leaf hydraulic conductance was greatly enhanced during the warmer afternoon periods under both low (0.75 to 1.5 kPa) and high (0.75 to 3.5 kPa) diurnal VPDL regimes, unlike stomatal conductance ( g s ), which decreased in the afternoon. Consequently, the leaf water status remained largely isohydric throughout the day, and therefore cannot be evoked to explain the diurnal decrease of g m . However, the concerted diurnal reductions of g m and g s were well correlated with increases in leaf abscisic acid (ABA) content, thus suggesting that ABA can induce a significant depression of g m under favourable leaf water status. Our results challenge the view that the temperature dependence of g m can be explained solely from dynamic leaf anatomical adjustments and/or from the known thermodynamic properties of aqueous solutions and lipid membranes.