Premium
Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
Author(s) -
CARRIQUÍ M.,
CABRERA H. M.,
CONESA M. À.,
COOPMAN R. E.,
DOUTHE C.,
GAGO J.,
GALLÉ A.,
GALMÉS J.,
RIBASCARBO M.,
TOMÁS M.,
FLEXAS J.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/pce.12402
Subject(s) - photosynthesis , botany , biology , photosynthetic capacity , chloroplast , stomatal conductance , c4 photosynthesis , biochemistry , gene
Ferns are thought to have lower photosynthetic rates than angiosperms and they lack fine stomatal regulation. However, no study has directly compared photosynthesis in plants of both groups grown under optimal conditions in a common environment. We present a common garden comparison of seven angiosperms and seven ferns paired by habitat preference, with the aims of (1) confirming that ferns do have lower photosynthesis capacity than angiosperms and quantifying these differences; (2) determining the importance of diffusional versus biochemical limitations; and (3) analysing the potential implication of leaf anatomical traits in setting the photosynthesis capacity in both groups. On average, the photosynthetic rate of ferns was about half that of angiosperms, and they exhibited lower stomatal and mesophyll conductance to CO 2 ( g m ), maximum velocity of carboxylation and electron transport rate. A quantitative limitation analysis revealed that stomatal and mesophyll conductances were co‐responsible for the lower photosynthesis of ferns as compared with angiosperms. However, g m alone was the most constraining factor for photosynthesis in ferns. Consistently, leaf anatomy showed important differences between angiosperms and ferns, especially in cell wall thickness and the surface of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular air spaces.