Premium
Kinetics of xylem loading, membrane potential maintenance, and sensitivity of K + ‐permeable channels to reactive oxygen species: physiological traits that differentiate salinity tolerance between pea and barley
Author(s) -
BOSE JAYAKUMAR,
SHABALA LANA,
POTTOSIN IGOR,
ZENG FANRONG,
VELARDEBUENDÍA ANAMARIA,
MASSART AMANDINE,
POSCHENRIEDER CHARLOTTE,
HARIADI YUDA,
SHABALA SERGEY
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/pce.12180
Subject(s) - xylem , salinity , apex (geometry) , biophysics , shoot , membrane potential , depolarization , chemistry , potassium , botany , horticulture , biology , ecology , organic chemistry
Abstract Salt sensitive (pea) and salt tolerant (barley) species were used to understand the physiological basis of differential salinity tolerance in crops. Pea plants were much more efficient in restoring otherwise depolarized membrane potential thereby effectively decreasing K + efflux through depolarization‐activated outward rectifying potassium channels. At the same time, pea root apex was 10‐fold more sensitive to physiologically relevant H 2 O 2 concentration and accumulated larger amounts of H 2 O 2 under saline conditions. This resulted in a rapid loss of cell viability in the pea root apex. Barley plants rapidly loaded Na + into the xylem; this increase was only transient, and xylem and leaf Na + concentration remained at a steady level for weeks. On the contrary, pea plants restricted xylem Na + loading during the first few days of treatment but failed to prevent shoot Na + elevation in the long term. It is concluded that superior salinity tolerance of barley plants compared with pea is conferred by at least three different mechanisms: (1) efficient control of xylem Na + loading; (2) efficient control of H 2 O 2 accumulation and reduced sensitivity of non‐selective cation channels to H 2 O 2 in the root apex; and (3) higher energy saving efficiency, with less ATP spent to maintain membrane potential under saline conditions.