z-logo
Premium
Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure deficit reflect tissue‐specific differences in hydraulic conductance
Author(s) -
OCHELTREE T. W.,
NIPPERT J. B.,
PRASAD P. V. V.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/pce.12137
Subject(s) - transpiration , vapour pressure deficit , stomatal conductance , conductance , limiting , botany , water use efficiency , hydraulic resistance , horticulture , chemistry , agronomy , biology , photosynthesis , mathematics , physics , mechanical engineering , combinatorics , mechanics , engineering
The vapor pressure deficit ( D ) of the atmosphere can negatively affect plant growth as plants reduce stomatal conductance to water vapor ( g wv ) in response to increasing D , limiting the ability of plants to assimilate carbon. The sensitivity of g wv to changes in D varies among species and has been correlated with the hydraulic conductance of leaves ( K leaf ), but the hydraulic conductance of other tissues has also been implicated in plant responses to changing D . Among the 19 grass species, we found that K leaf was correlated with the hydraulic conductance of large longitudinal veins ( K lv , r 2  = 0.81), but was not related to K root ( r 2  = 0.01). Stomatal sensitivity to D was correlated with K leaf relative to total leaf area ( r 2  = 0.50), and did not differ between C 3 and C 4 species. Transpiration ( E ) increased in response to D , but 8 of the 19 plants showed a decline in E at high D , indicative of an ‘apparent feedforward’ response. For these individuals , E began to decline at lower values of D in plants with low K root ( r 2  = 0.72). These results show the significance of both leaf and root hydraulic conductance as drivers of plant responses to evaporative demand.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here