Premium
Inventory of Personal Factors Influencing Conditioned Pain Modulation in Healthy People: A Systematic Literature Review
Author(s) -
Hermans Linda,
Van Oosterwijck Jessica,
Goubert Dorien,
Goudman Lisa,
Crombez Geert,
Calders Patrick,
Meeus Mira
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pain practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.899
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1533-2500
pISSN - 1530-7085
DOI - 10.1111/papr.12305
Subject(s) - medicine , physical therapy , systematic review , chronic pain , clinical psychology , medline , political science , law
Background Conditioned pain modulation ( CPM ) is believed to play an important role in the development and exacerbation of chronic pain, because dysfunction of CPM is associated with a shift in balance between pain facilitation and pain inhibition. In many patients with central sensitization, CPM is less efficacious. Besides that, efficacy of CPM is highly variable in healthy people. Consequently, it seems that several individual variables may influence CPM . A systematic review examining personal factors influencing CPM was conducted. Methods This systematic review follows the PRISMA guidelines. “Pubmed” and “Web of Science” were searched using different synonyms of CPM . Full‐text clinical reports addressing the influence of personal factors on CPM in healthy adults were included. Checklists for RCT s and case–control studies provided by the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement ( CBO ) and the Dutch Cochrane Centre were utilized to assess methodological quality. Levels of evidence and strength of conclusion were assigned using the CBO guidelines. Results Forty‐six articles were identified that reported the influence of personal factors on CPM . Quality assessment revealed 10 studies with a methodological quality less than 50% wherefore they were excluded (21.8%), resulting in a general total methodological quality score of 72.5%. Overall younger adult age, male gender, ovulatory phase, positive expectations, attention to the conditioning stimulus, and carrier of the 5‐ HTTLPR long allele result in better CPM . Conclusion It is advised for future studies to take these factors into account. Further research regarding the influence of oral contraceptives, catastrophizing, information about conditioning stimulation, distraction, physical activity, and genetics on CPM magnitude is required.