Premium
A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence for Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment for Cervico‐Thoracic Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Author(s) -
Desai Mehul J.,
Shkolnikova Tatyana,
Nava Andrew,
Inwald Danielle
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
pain practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.899
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1533-2500
pISSN - 1530-7085
DOI - 10.1111/papr.12074
Subject(s) - medicine , myofascial pain syndrome , critical appraisal , botulinum toxin , quality of evidence , medline , myofascial pain , randomized controlled trial , evidence based medicine , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , alternative medicine , surgery , pathology , political science , law
Myofascial pain syndrome ( MPS ) is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by regional pain and muscle tenderness associated with the presence of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). The last decade has seen an exponential increase in the use of botulinum toxin (BTX) to treat MPS. To understand the medical evidence substantiating the role of therapeutic BTX injections and to provide useful information for the medical practitioner, we applied the principles of evidence‐based medicine to the treatment for cervico‐thoracic MPS. A search was conducted through MEDLINE (PubMed, OVID, MDConsult), EMBASE , SCOPUS and the Cochrane database for the period 1966 to 2012 using the following keywords: myofascial pain, muscle pain, botulinum toxin, trigger points, and injections. A total of 7 trials satisfied our inclusion criteria and were evaluated in this review. Although the majority of studies found negative results, our analysis identified Gobel et al.'s as the highest quality study among these prospectively randomized investigations. This was due to appropriate identification of diagnostic criteria, excellent study design and objective endpoints. The 6 other identified studies had significant failings due to deficiencies in 1 or more major criteria. We conclude that higher quality, rigorously standardized studies are needed to more appropriately investigate this promising treatment modality.