z-logo
Premium
Understanding Fallible Warrant and Fallible Knowledge: Three Proposals
Author(s) -
Hetherington Stephen
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pacific philosophical quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.914
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1468-0114
pISSN - 0279-0750
DOI - 10.1111/papq.12124
Subject(s) - warrant , schematic , epistemology , economic justice , philosophy , law , political science , economics , electronic engineering , financial economics , engineering
One of contemporary epistemology's more important conceptual challenges is that of understanding the nature of fallibility. Part of why this matters is that it would contribute to our understanding the natures of fallible warrant and fallible knowledge. This article evaluates two candidates – and describes a shared form of failing. Each is concealedly in fallibilist. This failing is all‐too‐representative of the difficulty of doing justice to the notion of fallibility within the notions of fallible warrant and fallible knowledge. The article ends with a proposal for an improved (even if schematic) form of conception of fallible warrant and fallible knowledge.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here