Multiple Realizability, Constraints, and Identity

Shapiro has suggested that the empirical plausibility of the multiple realizability of human‐like minds is dubious, because a contrary thesis, the M ental C onstraint T hesis, enjoys positive empirical evidence. The M ental C onstraint T hesis states that, given the actual physical laws, there is only one way to realize a human‐like mind. I will suggest, however, that the M ental C onstraint T hesis is not a contrary to the empirical multiple realizability thesis relevant to psychological reduction or autonomy and, as a consequence, has no bearing on those classificatory issues.