Premium
Early experience with erector spinae plane blocks in children
Author(s) -
Holland Erica L.,
Bosenberg Adrian T.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pediatric anesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.704
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1460-9592
pISSN - 1155-5645
DOI - 10.1111/pan.13804
Subject(s) - medicine , anesthesia , block (permutation group theory) , erector spinae muscles , retrospective cohort study , surgery , lumbar , geometry , mathematics
Background An erector spinae plane block is a relatively new regional anesthetic technique. Apart from case reports and small series, the literature regarding pediatric use is limited. Aim Our objective was to determine the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block in children by measuring the heart rate response to incision. Secondary objectives included feasibility, safety, opioid consumption, and pain scores. Furthermore, we reviewed this block in children published since 2016. Study design Case Series; Level of evidence, IV. Methods With Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who received erector spinae plane block for surgery between October 2017 and May 2019 at a single institution. Blocks were performed under anesthesia, using ultrasound guidance prior to surgical incision. Block details and hemodynamic and analgesic data were collected. In addition, a PubMed literature review was conducted to identify all erector spinae plane block related publications in patients ≤18 years of age. Results About 164 patients, 2 days‐19.4 years, weighing 2.3‐94.7 kg, received erector spinae plane blocks. For more than 79% of single injection blocks, placement time was ≤10 minutes. Using a heart rate increase of <10% at skin incision as criterion, 70.1% of patients had a successful block. Only 20% required long‐acting opioids intraoperatively. In a subset of infants who underwent gastrostomy surgery using a dose of 0.5 mL/kg, a local anesthetic spread of at least five dermatomes (0.1 mL/kg/dermatome) was achieved. Per the literature review, 33 publications described erector spinae plane block in 128 children. No complications were reported. Conclusion Erector spinae plane blocks are relatively easy to perform in children with no complications reported to date. The efficacy of the block for a broad spectrum of surgeries, involving incisions from T1 to L4, is encouraging.