z-logo
Premium
Bronchial allergen challenges in children – safety and predictors
Author(s) -
Schulze Johannes,
Reinmüller Wanda,
Herrmann Eva,
Rosewich Martin,
Rose Markus A.,
Zielen Stefan
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
pediatric allergy and immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.269
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1399-3038
pISSN - 0905-6157
DOI - 10.1111/pai.12031
Subject(s) - medicine , asthma , receiver operating characteristic , area under the curve , methacholine , logistic regression , allergy , immunoglobulin e , allergen , gastroenterology , prospective cohort study , immunology , area under curve , house dust mite , exhaled nitric oxide , bronchial hyperresponsiveness , respiratory disease , spirometry , antibody , lung , pharmacokinetics
Background In allergic asthma, the diagnosis of house dust mite ( HDM ) allergy is mainly based on the patient's history, allergy testing by the skin prick test ( SPT ) or the levels of allergen‐specific IgE. We retrospectively analysed data from 350 bronchial provocations with HDM and related it to the following parameters: specific IgE, bronchial hyperresponsiveness ( BHR ) to methacholine testing ( MCT ) and exhaled NO ( eNO ). Methods Approximately 350 patients (5–18 yr of age) with allergic asthma and a positive SPT to HDM s were included. To define the sensitivity and specificity for the detection method of an early asthmatic response ( EAR ), a receiver‐operating characteristic ( ROC ) curve was plotted. The accuracy was measured by the area under the ROC curve ( AUC ). A logistic regression model was used to predict the individual probability of a positive challenge. The results of the regression model were validated in a prospective group of n = 75 patients. Results The following cut‐off values showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity: specific IgE Dermatophagoides farinae 19.6  kU /l ( AUC , 0.88), PD 20 FEV 1 0.13 mg methacholine ( AUC , 0.73) and eNO 20.1 ppb ( AUC , 0.71). The following equation predicted the individual probability of a positive challenge in the retrospective and prospective group: p = 1 . [1 + exp[−(−1.78 + 2.46. 10 log D. far  − 1.25 .10 logPD 20 metha)]] −1 , ( AUC  = 0.88). Conclusions The value of using the specific I g E and MCT as predictors was confirmed in a large number of patients. We also showed, for the first time, that the eNO predicted the EAR . The logistic regression model is repeatable with a good accuracy.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom