Premium
Transferring emotional capital as coerced discretion: Street‐level bureaucrats reconciling structural deficiencies
Author(s) -
Lavee Einat,
Strier Roni
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.313
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1467-9299
pISSN - 0033-3298
DOI - 10.1111/padm.12598
Subject(s) - discretion , context (archaeology) , meaning (existential) , element (criminal law) , perspective (graphical) , service (business) , public policy , public relations , social capital , interpretation (philosophy) , law and economics , business , economics , political science , psychology , law , marketing , computer science , paleontology , artificial intelligence , psychotherapist , biology , programming language
The discretion of street‐level bureaucrats (SLBs) plays a key role in policy implementation. This study offers a new perspective on the meaning of discretion under social policy reforms, which created new structural deficiencies in the work of SLBs and have raised expectations of policy implementation without offering sufficient policy responses. Under such conditions, the discretion of SLBs should be understood as coerced, more so than as a positive element of freedom and choice. As such, SLBs are forced to employ informal practices and provide alternative resources for their clients. Findings indicate a transference of emotional resources from SLBs to clients, aimed at achieving policy outcomes of economically independent citizens, paradoxically accompanied by an awareness of powerful barriers to such conversion. The study contributes both to the understanding of discretion in policy implementation, in the context of an expanding public service gap, and to theories of emotion manifestation in public administration.