Premium
Clinical significance of incidentally detected lead perforations by computed tomography
Author(s) -
Bhatia Prerana,
Chiou Tommy,
Svennberg Emma,
Khoche Swapnil,
Jacobs Kathleen,
Pollema Travis,
Pretorius Victor,
BirgersdotterGreen Ulrika
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.14229
Subject(s) - medicine , perforation , lead (geology) , pericardial effusion , tamponade , radiology , cardiac tamponade , clinical significance , retrospective cohort study , computed tomography , surgery , materials science , geomorphology , punching , metallurgy , geology
Abstract Background Computed tomography (CT) has an established role in detecting perforation of implanted pacemaker and defibrillator leads. The clinical significance of incidental finding of delayed lead perforation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of lead perforation as detected by CT in a cohort of patients undergoing transvenous laser lead extraction and characterize the association between finding of incidental lead perforation with periprocedural outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients that underwent chest CT and lead extraction were retrospectively assessed for presence of lead perforation. A total of 143 patients and 348 leads were assessed. The finding of lead perforation was correlated with findings from peri‐procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and outcomes of the lead extraction procedure. Results Lead perforations (including perforations <5 mm and ≥5 mm) were detected in 66 (46%) patients and 73 (21%) leads. Lead perforation ≥5 mm were less common and detected in 13 (9%) of patients and 14 (4%) of leads. There was no significant difference in the rates of peri‐procedural death, cardiac avulsion, cardiac tamponade or post‐extraction pericardial effusion in patients with and without lead perforation. Conclusions Incidental delayed lead perforations detected by CT are common and do not correlate with significant TEE findings or adverse peri‐procedural outcomes in patients undergoing lead extraction. Larger studies are needed to further characterize the frequency and safety of these findings.