Premium
Mobile echodensities on intracardiac device leads: Is it always a cause for concern?
Author(s) -
Robinson James,
Wang William Y. S.,
Kaye Gerry
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.13899
Subject(s) - medicine , intracardiac injection , asymptomatic , endocarditis , incidence (geometry) , infective endocarditis , tricuspid valve , cardiology , retrospective cohort study , surgery , optics , physics
Background Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) frequently undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). As a result, incidental mobile echodensities (MEDs) attached to device leads are commonly detected. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and clinical outcomes of incidental MEDs on CIED leads. Methods A retrospective analysis performed between 2011 and 2018 identified 3548 TTE studies performed on 1849 patients with CIEDs. Results MEDs were identified in 30 patients (1.6%) without clinical suspicion of infective endocarditis (IE). Patients with incidental MEDs were apyrexial, and those tested demonstrated low inflammatory markers and negative blood cultures (BC). In this group, the majority (83%) of MEDs were in the right atrium and no MEDs were detected near the tricuspid valve. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) did not influence clinical outcomes. No patient required long‐term antibiotics or lead extraction and no IE‐related deaths were identified from electronic health records during a mean follow‐up period of 43 months (1‐89). In contrast, nine patients with suspected IE were all pyrexial with elevated inflammatory markers, had positive BC, and had proven IE. In these cases, the majority of MEDs were at the device lead/tricuspid valve interface. MEDs close to the tricuspid valve were strongly associated with IE ( P < .0001). Conclusions The incidence of MEDs on CIED leads detected on routine TTE was 1.6%. Conservative management of asymptomatic patients with normal inflammatory markers and BC without TEE, antibiotics, or lead extraction did not reveal any signal for long‐term adverse events within the limitations of the study.