Premium
Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extractions for noninfectious superfluous leads in a Japanese population: A single‐center experience
Author(s) -
Higuchi Satoshi,
Shoda Morio,
Saito Satoshi,
Kanai Miwa,
Kataoka Shohei,
Yazaki Kyoichiro,
Yagishita Daigo,
Ejima Koichiro,
Hagiwara Nobuhisa
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.13806
Subject(s) - medicine , lead (geology) , pericardial effusion , complication , population , single center , surgery , environmental health , geomorphology , geology
Abstract Background A challenging decision exists as whether to abandon or remove noninfectious superfluous leads during lead revisions or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) upgrades. There is insufficient data in the Asian population to guide decision making. Methods This study investigated the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extractions (TLEs) in a high‐volume Japanese center. Among a total of 341 patients who underwent lead revisions or CIED upgrades between 2008 and 2018, 53 patients (16%) who underwent TLEs to remove the superfluous leads were analyzed. Results Indications for TLE were vascular issues (60%), recalled leads (21%), growth of the body size (6%), abandoned leads in young patients (6%), switch to a subcutaneous implanted cardiac defibrillator (4%), need for an MRI conditional CIED (2%), and risks of vascular injury (2%). The population included 29 patients (55%) with nonfunctional leads and 24 (45%) with functional abandoned leads. A total of 74 target leads (mean 1.4 leads/person, median lead age 6.7 years) were extracted with a complete removal achieved in 98%. All coexisting leads, intended for continued use, were not damaged. All new leads (mean 1.4 leads/person) that had been simultaneously implanted during the TLE procedures were successfully implanted. There was one minor complication (2%) involving a pericardial effusion but it did not affect the hemodynamics. Conclusions In this Japanese single center experience, the removal of noninfectious superfluous leads with TLEs seemed to be a safe and effective therapeutic option.