Premium
Reproducibility of acute pulmonary vein isolation guided by the ablation index
Author(s) -
Solimene Francesco,
Lepillier Antoine,
Ruvo Ermenegildo,
Scaglione Marco,
Anselmino Matteo,
Sebag Frederic A.,
Pecora Domenico,
Gallagher Mark M.,
Rillo Mariano,
Viola Graziana,
Rossi Luca,
Santis Valerio,
Landolina Maurizio,
Castro Antonello,
Grimaldi Massimo,
Badenco Nicolas,
Del Greco Maurizio,
Simone Antonio,
Bertaglia Emanuele,
Stabile Giuseppe
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.13710
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonary vein , ablation , atrial fibrillation , catheter , fluoroscopy , catheter ablation , reproducibility , lesion , nuclear medicine , surgery , cardiology , statistics , mathematics
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation outcome is still operator dependent. Ablation Index (AI) is a new lesion quality marker that has been demonstrated to allow acute durable pulmonary vein (PV) isolation followed by a high single‐procedure arrhythmia‐free survival. This prospective, multicenter study was designed to evaluate the reproducibility of acute PV isolation guided by the AI. Methods A total of 490 consecutive patients with paroxysmal (80.4%) and persistent AF underwent first time PV encircling and were divided in four study groups according to operator preference in choosing the ablation catheter (a contact force [ST] or contact force surround flow [STSF] catheter) and the AI setting (330 at posterior and 450 at anterior wall or 380 at posterior and 500 at anterior wall). Radiofrequency was delivered targeting interlesion distance ≤6 mm. Results The rate of first‐pass PV isolation (ST330 90 ± 16%, ST380 87 ± 19%, STSF330 90 ± 17%, STSF380 91 ± 15%, P = .585) was similar among the four study groups, whereas procedure (ST330 129 ± 44 minutes, ST380 144 ± 44 minutes, STSF330 120 ± 72 minutes, STSF380 125 ± 73 minutes, P < .001) and fluoroscopy time (ST330 542 ± 285 seconds, ST380 540 ± 416 seconds, STSF330 257 ± 356 seconds, STSF380 379 ± 454 seconds, P < 0.001) significantly differed. The difference in the rate of first‐pass isolation was not statistical different ( P = .06) among the 12 operators that performed at least 15 procedures. Conclusions An ablation protocol respecting strict criteria for contiguity and quality lesion results in high and comparable rate of acute PV isolation among operator performing ablation with different catheters, AI settings, procedure, and fluoroscopy times.