Premium
Behavior of leadless AV synchronous pacing during atrial arrhythmias and stability of the atrial signals over time—Results of the MARVEL Evolve subanalysis
Author(s) -
Garweg Christophe,
Splett Vincent,
Sheldon Todd J.,
Chinitz Larry,
Ritter Philippe,
Steinwender Clemens,
Lemme Francesca,
Willems Rik
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.13615
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , atrial flutter , cardiology , bradycardia , tachycardia , atrial tachycardia , heart rate , sick sinus syndrome , premature atrial contraction , confidence interval , atrioventricular block , anesthesia , blood pressure , catheter ablation
The MARVEL study demonstrated at a single time point that accelerometer (ACC)‐based atrial sensing improves atrioventricular (AV) synchrony (AVS) in patients with AV block and a Micra pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The purpose of the MARVEL Evolve substudy was to assess the performance over time. Methods This prospective single‐center study compared AVS and ACC signals at two visits ≥6 months apart. Custom software was temporarily downloaded into the Micra at each visit and AVS was measured during 30 min at rest. Results Nine patients from the MARVEL study were enrolled. The mean (±standard deviation) age was 82.3 ± 6.0 years old, 67% were male, and a Micra was implanted for 6.0 ± 6.4 months. High‐degree AV block was present in four patients, whereas five with predominantly intrinsic conduction required intermittent pacing for bradycardia. The mean interval between visits was 7.1 ± 0.6 months. Seven patients had normal sinus node function at both visits and were included in a paired analysis. Both ACC signal amplitude (visit 2‐visit 1 = 1.4 mG; 95% confidence interval [CI] [−25.8 to 28.4 mG]; P = 0.933) and AVS (visit 1: 90.8%, 95% CI [72.4, 97.4] and visit 2: 91.4%, 95% CI [63.8, 98.5]; P = 0.740) remained stable. Three patients had spontaneous atrial tachycardia. During atrial fibrillation, no atrial contraction was detected or tracked. During atrial flutter, intermittent tracking resulted in a ventricular rate of 60 ± 8 beats per minute (bpm); there was no ventricular pacing >100 bpm. Conclusion ACC signals amplitude and performance of AVS pacing were stable over time. During atrial arrhythmias, the AV synchronous pacing mode behaved safely.