Premium
A simple technique for relocating chronic CIED leads to a subpectoral position for relief of erosion and pain
Author(s) -
Hesselson Aaron B.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.13366
Subject(s) - medicine , relocation , surgery , computer science , programming language
Background Methodology specific for moving superficial chronically implanted transvenous pacing leads to a subpectoral pocket is not described in the literature. Relocation of prepectoral leads and generator to a submuscular pocket for relief of erosion and pain with minimal pectoral trauma is possible by applying a variant of a previously described submammary tunneling technique. Methods All patients presenting for device follow‐up, elective battery replacement, or system upgrade over an 8‐month period were considered for relocation if experiencing significant thinning or pain over their prepectoral implant. Those selected for relocation then had their system moved subpectorally via the tunneling technique. Patients were followed for 6 months postoperatively for procedurally related complications and resolution of preprocedure symptoms. Results Thirty‐two leads in 14 patients were all successfully relocated. Of the relocated leads, five (16%) were a three‐pin connector implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead. Three patients (21%) in the group required short‐term prescription analgesia in the immediate postdischarge period. Pain and erosion concerns abated in the study group by the 3‐month follow‐up. Conclusions Relocation of superficial pacing leads with CIED generator to a subpectoral pocket facilitated by this tunneling method is successful, safe, and can accommodate single and multipin leads with minimal pectoral trauma and no nerve damage.