Premium
Adenosine‐sensitive Wolff‐Parkinson‐White: Longer time across the atrioventricular groove
Author(s) -
Beach Cheyenne,
Follansbee Christopher W.,
Beerman Lee,
Mazzocco Sharon,
Wang Li,
Arora Gaurav
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.13257
Subject(s) - adenosine , medicine , interquartile range , supraventricular tachycardia , cardiology , accessory pathway , ablation , tachycardia , catheter ablation , atrioventricular node , anesthesia
Background Successful ablation sites in Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome (WPW) are characterized by short atrioventricular (AV) intervals. Approximately 15% of patients with WPW have adenosine‐sensitive accessory pathways (APs). We sought to determine if local AV intervals of adenosine‐sensitive APs are different from those of adenosine‐insensitive APs in patients with WPW. Methods Patients ≤21 years with WPW and adenosine‐sensitive APs who underwent successful ablation over a 9‐year period were included. Patients with WPW and adenosine‐insensitive APs were matched by age and weight in a 1:2 case‐control design. AP location, antegrade and retrograde conduction properties, supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) inducibility, local AV interval, interval from delta wave onset to local ventricular activation (del‐V), and time to loss of preexcitation were reviewed. Results Fourteen patients with adenosine‐sensitive APs and 28 with adenosine‐insensitive APs were included. Patients with adenosine‐sensitive APs had minimum 1:1 antegrade AP conduction at a longer median paced cycle length (380, interquartile range [IQR] 295 to 585 ms vs 290, IQR 250 to 330 ms, P = 0.046), were less likely to have inducible SVT (35.7% vs 75.0%, P = 0.035), and had a longer median local AV interval (40.5, IQR 30.8 to 58.3 ms vs 32.0, IQR 29.3 to 37.8 ms, P = 0.029) when compared to those with adenosine‐insensitive APs. Conclusion Patients with WPW and adenosine‐sensitive APs have 1:1 antegrade AP conduction at longer cycle lengths, lower likelihood of SVT induction, and longer local AV intervals when compared to those with adenosine‐insensitive APs. In patients with WPW, it may be important to consider adenosine response when selecting appropriate ablation targets.