Premium
Noninvasive Determination of HV Interval Using Magnetocardiography
Author(s) -
SENTHILNATHAN SENGOTTUVEL,
SELVARAJ RAJA J.,
PATEL RAJESH,
SATHEESH SANTHOSH,
KATHOLIL GIREESAN,
JANAWADKAR MADHUKAR P.,
RADHAKRISHNAN THIMMAKUDY S.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.13067
Subject(s) - magnetocardiography , medicine , bundle , cardiology , nuclear medicine , qrs complex , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , materials science , composite material
Background The His‐ventricular (HV) interval is an important index of atrioventricular conduction, but at present can be reliably measured only during an invasive electrophysiology (EP) study. Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a noninvasive measurement of weak magnetic fields generated by the heart. We compared HV interval noninvasively assessed using MCG with the corresponding values measured directly in an EP study. Methods MCG was measured using a 37‐channel system inside a magnetically shielded room in patients who had previously undergone an EP study. His‐bundle potential was identified in the PR segment after signal averaging. Magnetic field maps representing the spatial distribution of ramp‐like signals in the PR segment generated at various instants of time were used to identify His‐bundle signals in cases where the deflection representing the His was ambiguous. Results The study included 23 patients (14 male, nine female) with a wide range of HV intervals measured during EP study (49 ± 17 ms, range 35–120 ms). In 21 (91%) subjects, discernible His‐bundle signals are observed in the PR segment of MCG traces. HV intervals measured between the two methods showed a correlation (r 2 = 0.87, P < 0.0001) with a mean difference of 5.4 ± 3.2 ms. Conclusion With the use of new criteria to identify the His‐bundle deflection in signal‐averaged MCG signals, we report a high success rate in noninvasive HV interval measurement and a good agreement with those from EP study. The results encourage the use of MCG as a noninvasive method for measurement of the HV interval.