Premium
Retraction Statement: ‘Safety and Feasibility of Leadless Pacemaker Compared with Traditional Transvenous Single‐Lead Pacemaker: An Animal Study’ by Lan T, Wang H, Sun X, Zhao X, Yang G, Chen K, and Zheng X.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.12602
Subject(s) - medicine , statement (logic) , pace , law , geodesy , geography , political science
The above article, published online as an Accepted Article on 31 January 2015 in Wiley Online Library ( wileyonlinelibrary.com ), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal Editor‐in‐Chief, John D. Fisher, and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The retraction has been agreed due to serious methodological, statistical, and factual errors, as well as authorship concerns reported by the authors post publication. Reference Lan T, Wang H, Sun X, Zhao X, Yang G, Chen K, Zheng X. Safety and feasibility of leadless pacemaker compared with traditional transvenous single‐lead pacemaker: An animal study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2015; doi: 10.1111/pace.12602