Premium
Remote Past Left Ventricular Function before Chronic Right Ventricular Pacing Predicts Responses to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Upgrade
Author(s) -
CHANG POCHENG,
WO HUNGTA,
CHEN TIENHSING,
WU DELON,
LIN FENCHIUNG,
WANG CHUNCHIEH
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1111/pace.12291
Subject(s) - cardiac resynchronization therapy , medicine , ejection fraction , cardiology , upgrade , qrs complex , heart failure , ventricular pacing , receiver operating characteristic , computer science , operating system
Background This study examined factors that could predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade in patients who developed heart failure (HF) after long‐term right ventricular (RV) pacing. Methods Twenty‐five consecutive patients who received CRT upgrade for long‐term RV pacing (RVP) were enrolled in this study. None of these patients were eligible for CRT at the moment of starting RVP. After 5.7 ± 4.0 years chronic RVP, these 25 patients developed HF symptoms and received CRT upgrade. Echocardiography was conducted at the moment of CRT upgrade and 6 months after CRT. Remote past left ventricular ejection fraction (RP‐LVEF) at the moment of starting RVP was retrospectively obtained from the echocardiographic and cardiac catherization reports. Responders were defined as a reduction in LV end‐systolic volume (LVESV) ≥15%. Their clinical and echocardiographic parameters were analyzed and compared. Results Responders had significant higher RP‐LVEF as compared to nonresponders (53.6 ± 16.5% vs 31.4 ± 11.6%, P = 0.002). RP‐LVEF correlated with reduction in LVESV after CRT upgrade (P < 0.001). RP‐LVEF ≥ 43.5% as a cutoff value predicted response to CRT upgrade with an area under the receiver‐operating curve of 0.87, a sensitivity of 78%, and a specificity of 100%. Intrinsic QRS width, septal‐posterior wall motion delay, or tissue Doppler‐derived dyssynchrony indexes did not predict responses to CRT upgrade. Conclusion In long‐term RVP patients who developed HF and received CRT upgrade, RP‐LVEF ≥ 43.5% predicts good response. Conventional dyssynchrony indexes do not predict responses to CRT upgrade in these patients.