Open AccessTriangular Mechanical Structure of the Proximal Femur
Author(s) -
Xu Gaoxiang,
Li Jiantao,
Xu Cheng,
Xiong Dou,
Li Hua,
Wang Daofeng,
Zhang Wupeng,
Zhang Hao,
Zhang Licheng,
Tang Peifu
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
orthopaedic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1757-7861
pISSN - 1757-7853
DOI - 10.1111/os.13498
Subject(s) - femur , anatomy , medullary cavity , von mises yield criterion , medicine , femoral neck , computed tomographic , computed tomography , nuclear medicine , materials science , finite element method , surgery , osteoporosis , physics , thermodynamics , endocrinology
Objective The mechanical high modulus structure of the proximal femur could guide clinical surgical treatment and instrument design of proximal femoral fractures. The purpose of this study is to analyze and verify the mechanical structure of the proximal femur. Methods A total of 375 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were imaged using computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients were grouped according to age and sex. Cortical and medullary cavity parameters (cortical thickness [CTh], cortical mean density [CM], upper‐lower diameter length [ULL], and medial‐lateral diameter length [MLL]) were measured at eight planes. Six proximal femoral finite element models of different sexes and ages were constructed. To verify the measurement results, Abaqus was used to implement the force load to describe the von Mises stress distribution, and the maximum von Mises stress values of each wall of the proximal femur were compared. Results The CTh values of the lower and upper walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls of the femoral neck ( p < 0.05). The CM values of the lower and upper walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls of the subcephalic and middle femoral neck ( p < 0.05). The ULL value gradually increased from the subcephalic region to the bottom ( p < 0.05). The CTh and CM values of the medial and lateral walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls in the femoral trochanteric region ( p < 0.05). The MLL value decreased gradually from the plane 20 mm above the upper edge to that 20 mm below the vertex of the femoral lesser trochanter ( p < 0.05). The von Mises stress was concentrated on the upper and lower walls of the femoral neck and on the medial and lateral walls of the femoral trochanteric region. The maximum von Mises stress values of the upper and lower walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls of the femoral neck. The maximum von Mises stress values of the medial and lateral walls were higher than those of the anterior and posterior walls in the femoral trochanteric region, except for the plane 20 mm above the upper edge of the femoral lesser trochanter. Conclusion The bone mass of the proximal femur presented a triangular high‐modulus distribution, which bore the main stress of the proximal femur. The triangular mechanical structure provides a guideline for the surgical strategy and instrument design of the proximal femur.