Open AccessA Comparison Between Retaining and Resecting the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Author(s) -
Hu Wenhao,
Hu Fanqi,
Liu Chao,
Liu Weibo,
Jiang Yi,
Li Jing,
Wang Yan,
Li Teng,
Li Li,
Zhang Xuesong
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
orthopaedic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1757-7861
pISSN - 1757-7853
DOI - 10.1111/os.13257
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , oswestry disability index , percutaneous , retrospective cohort study , visual analogue scale , posterior longitudinal ligament , odds ratio , confidence interval , discectomy , diskectomy , lumbar , lumbar vertebrae , low back pain , alternative medicine , cervical spine , pathology
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of retaining the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) with resecting the PLL in inside‐out percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Method A total of 135 patients with symptomatic LDH who were treated by inside‐out PETD surgery from January 2015 to January 2017were included in this retrospective analysis. There were 38 males and 30 females in the PLL resection group (mean age = 52.40 ± 8.73 years) and 35 males and 32 females in the PLL retention group (mean age = 53.50 ± 9.24 years). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Operation time, blood loss, recurrence of LDH, and complications were recorded. Three months after surgery, magnetic resonance imaging was performed to confirm that nerve root compression was relieved. Results The VAS and ODI scores improved significantly immediately after surgery, at 1 month after surgery, at 3 months after surgery, and at last follow‐up compared with those before surgery ( P < 0.01). The scores also improved significantly between immediately after surgery and 1 month after surgery in the two groups ( P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥ 50 years (odds ratio ( OR ) = 6.33, 95% confidence interval ( CI ): 1.64–21.98, P = 0.014), pain duration ≥6 months ( OR = 4.68, 95% CI : 1.29–6.51, P = 0.025), pre‐ODI score ≥ 40% ( OR = 5.97, 95% CI : 2.41–14.86, P = 0.003) were all associated with poor functional outcomes. There was no significant difference in the excellent/good ratio between the two groups and the mean operation time of the retention group was 71.5% of that of the resection group (82.7 ± 18.5 min vs 115.6 ± 24.6 min, P < 0.01). In the patients, no serious complications, such as dural tear, wound infection, or persistent nerve root injury, were observed during the follow‐up period. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups (6/68 vs 6/67, P = 0.979). Although the recurrence rate was higher in retention group, there was no significant difference between the two groups (1/68 vs 2/67, P = 0.551). Conclusion The PLL is recommended to be retained for inside‐out PETD surgery.