Open AccessComparison of the Wiltse Approach and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Under O‐arm Navigation for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
Author(s) -
Lu Yingjie,
Miao Yiming,
Zhu Tianfeng,
Wu Qian,
Shen Xu,
Lu Dongdong,
Zhu Xuesong,
Gan Minfeng
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
orthopaedic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1757-7861
pISSN - 1757-7853
DOI - 10.1111/os.13053
Subject(s) - medicine , oswestry disability index , surgery , percutaneous , internal fixation , cobb angle , visual analogue scale , spinal fracture , fixation (population genetics) , burst fracture , thoracic vertebrae , lumbar vertebrae , radiography , low back pain , lumbar , population , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the Wiltse approach and percutaneous pedicle screw placement under O‐arm navigation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Methods We enrolled a total of 54 patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar fracture who received minimally invasive treatments between October 2014 and October 2018 in this retrospective study. Among these, 28 patients (22 males and six females, with a mean age of 48.6 ± 9.6 years) were treated with pedicle screw fixation through the Wiltse approach (WPSF), and another 26 (15 males and 11 females, with a mean age of 45.7 ± 10.6 years) received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under O‐arm navigation (OPSF). Statistical methods were used to perform a detailed comparison of clinical outcomes, radiologic findings, and complications between the two groups obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last follow‐up. Results All patients underwent surgery successfully and finished a follow‐up of more than 12 months. No serious complications, such as infection, blood vessel injury, or spinal cord or nerve root injury occurred. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, local Cobb angle (LCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA), and R value were notably improved after surgery, though there was no clear discrepancy between the groups at each time point ( P > 0.05). During the follow‐up period, no patients developed neurological impairment or implant‐related complications, and no patients underwent revision surgery. The WPSF group had a significantly shorter operation time than the OPSF group (68.1 ± 9.8 vs 76.1 ± 9.0 minutes, P = 0.005). Moreover, the WPSF group showed less cost of surgery than the WPSF group (48142.1 ± 1430.1 vs 59035.4 ± 1152.7 CNY, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the intraoperative bleeding, length of incision, or postoperative hospitalization time ( P > 0.05). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was 95.2% (160/168) in the WPSF group and 96.8% (151/156) in the OPSF group, with no significant difference between the groups ( P = 0.432). Conclusion Both WPSF and OPSF were safe and effective for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Although the two groups showed favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes through to final follow‐up, we recommended the minimally invasive WPSF given its shorter operation time and lower cost of surgery.