z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Tumor‐to‐background Ratio to Predict Response to Chemotherapy of Osteosarcoma Better than Standard Uptake Values
Author(s) -
He Jinpeng,
Hao Yun,
Li Mi,
Wang Jiang,
Guo Fengjin
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
orthopaedic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1757-7861
pISSN - 1757-7853
DOI - 10.1111/os.12102
Subject(s) - osteosarcoma , medicine , chemotherapy , standardized uptake value , positron emission tomography , predictive value , neoadjuvant therapy , oncology , radiology , nuclear medicine , surgery , pathology , cancer , breast cancer
Objective According to the current treatment protocol of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study, it is mandatory to determine the histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment before surgical removal of the tumor, particularly if a limb salvage procedure is planned. The aim of this systematic, retrospective study was to evaluate the ability of 2‐( 18 F ) fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐ D ‐glucose positron‐emission tomography/computed tomography to predict chemotherapy response of osteosarcoma and to identify a simple promising method for noninvasive evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma. Methods The PubMed database was searched to identify and analyze relevant published reports. In particular, correlations between tumor‐to‐background ratio ( TBR ), standard uptake value ( SUV ) and histological response to chemotherapy were assessed. Results It was found that good responses are achieved in patients with TBR after chemotherapy ( TBR2 )/ TBR before chemotherapy ( TBR1 ) < 0.470 (positive predictive value [ PPV ] = 92.31%, negative predictive value [ NPV ] = 82.76%, sensitivity [ S ] = 87.80%, specificity [ SP ] = 88.89%), whereas poor responses occur in patients with SUV after chemotherapy/before chemotherapy ( SUV2 / SUV1 ) > 0.396 ( PPV = 73.68%, NPV = 73.33%, S = 63.64%, SP = 81.48%). Conclusion Changes in TBR are better predictors of chemotherapy response than SUV in osteosarcoma patients. Therefore, we believe that choice of surgical strategy is optimally based on changes in TBR.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here