Premium
Assessment of neuroretinal function in a group of functional amblyopes with documented LGN deficits
Author(s) -
Brown Brian,
Feigl Beatrix,
Gole Glen A,
Mullen Kathy,
Hess Robert F
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
ophthalmic and physiological optics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.147
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1475-1313
pISSN - 0275-5408
DOI - 10.1111/opo.12024
Subject(s) - erg , ophthalmology , fixation (population genetics) , electroretinography , retinal , retina , lateral geniculate nucleus , visual field , optometry , medicine , audiology , psychology , neuroscience , population , environmental health
Purpose In this study we examine neuroretinal function in five amblyopes, who had been shown in previous functional MRI ( fMRI ) studies to have compromised function of the lateral geniculate nucleus ( LGN ), to determine if the fMRI deficit in amblyopia may have its origin at the retinal level. Methods We used slow flash multifocal ERG (mf ERG ) and compared averaged five ring responses of the amblyopic and fellow eyes across a 35 deg field. Central responses were also assessed over a field which was about 6.3 deg in diameter. We measured central retinal thickness using optical coherence tomography. Central fields were measured using the MP1‐Microperimeter which also assesses ocular fixation during perimetry. Mf ERG data were compared with fMRI results from a previous study. Results Amblyopic eyes had reduced response density amplitudes (first major negative to first positive (N1‐P1) responses) for the central and paracentral retina (up to 18 deg diameter) but not for the mid‐periphery (from 18 to 35 deg). Retinal thickness was within normal limits for all eyes, and not different between amblyopic and fellow eyes. Fixation was maintained within the central 4° more than 80% of the time by four of the five participants; fixation assessed using bivariate contour ellipse areas ( BCEA ) gave rankings similar to those of the MP ‐1 system. There was no significant relationship between BCEA and mf ERG response for either amblyopic or fellow eye. There was no significant relationship between the central mf ERG eye response difference and the selective blood oxygen level dependent ( BOLD ) LGN eye response difference previously seen in these participants. Conclusions Retinal responses in amblyopes can be reduced within the central field without an obvious anatomical basis. Additionally, this retinal deficit may not be the reason why the LGN BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) responses are reduced for amblyopic eye stimulation.