Premium
Continuity in care trajectories of older chronically ill patients in a battlefield of competing rationales
Author(s) -
Kjerholt Mette,
Wagner Lis,
Delmar Charlotte,
Clemensen Jane,
Lindhardt Tove
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of older people nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.707
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 1748-3743
pISSN - 1748-3735
DOI - 10.1111/opn.12031
Subject(s) - nursing , medicine , feeling , status quo , perspective (graphical) , audit , continuity of care , psychology , health care , social psychology , market economy , management , artificial intelligence , computer science , economics , economic growth
Background Continuity is crucial when caring for older chronically ill patients. Research has shown that the integration of patients' own perspectives on their situation is of utmost importance for continuity and quality of care. Studies have, however, demonstrated a number of problems with health professionals' communication concerning older patients, leading to lack of continuity and integration of the patient perspective in care and treatment. In spite of these problems being well investigated, they continue to prevail. Objectives To examine conditions for continuity and integration of the patient perspective in older, chronically ill patients' care as reflected in nursing staff's communication about the patients. Design Explorative Participatory Action Research ( PAR ). Setting An acute, general medical ward at a Danish university hospital. Participants Hospital and municipality nurses ( n = 29). Nursing records ( n = 12). Method Field studies: observations, interviews, nursing records audits and logs. Data were subject to manifest and latent content analysis. Results Participants were aware of the importance of ensuring continuity, a comprehensive approach and integration of the patient perspective in care trajectories of older, chronically ill patients. Although they adhered to these ideals, they rarely pursued them in practice. Hindering factors were: organisational values, episodic focus on patients and lack of time. They felt caught in a value conflict between nursing professional values and system values, which caused a feeling of powerlessness, maintaining status quo in their clinical practice. Conclusion The prevailing episodic focus and the competing rationales on the ward constituted a barrier to continuity and integration of the patient perspective in a comprehensive way. Implications for practice In order to change actual practice management and staff must demand and act on a practice based on professional nursing values, for instance by using PAR due to the empowered and innovative processes involved.