z-logo
Premium
Colonial Representations and Carthaginian Archaeology
Author(s) -
Fumadó Ortega Iván
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
oxford journal of archaeology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.382
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1468-0092
pISSN - 0262-5253
DOI - 10.1111/ojoa.12002
Subject(s) - interpretation (philosophy) , representation (politics) , archaeology , history , civilization , colonialism , excavation , linguistics , politics , philosophy , law , political science
Summary In spite of the interest generated by P hoenician‐ P unic Archaeology, this area of study has always been underestimated by comparison with C lassical Archaeology. One of the main reasons for this is the persistence of a colonial representation of the ancient M editerranean which assumes Greek culture to be the supreme expression of civilization. Other groups may imitate it through an acculturation process: Hellenization. As we shall see, this representation pervades even the P hoenician‐ P unic history and archaeology university textbooks. Starting with the various reasons leading to this situation, I aim to focus on the interpretation given to the ancient excavations at C arthage and, specifically, to its architectural and urban record, since this was the area of study where the prejudices about the P hoenician‐ P unic culture found an (albeit misunderstood) archaeological proof. I shall argue that the misinterpretation of these excavations is the key to understanding later developments and the general underestimation of P hoenician‐ P unic A rchaeology.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom