Premium
Accuracy of 3D virtual surgical planning for maxillary positioning and orientation in orthognathic surgery
Author(s) -
Tonin Renata Hernandes,
Iwaki Filho Liogi,
Yamashita Amanda Lury,
Ferraz Flávio Wellington da Silva,
Tolentino Elen de Souza,
Previdelli Isolde Terezinha dos Santos,
Brum Beatriz,
Iwaki Lilian Cristina Vessoni
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
orthodontics and craniofacial research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1601-6343
pISSN - 1601-6335
DOI - 10.1111/ocr.12363
Subject(s) - orthognathic surgery , surgical planning , medicine , cone beam computed tomography , orthodontics , cephalometry , orientation (vector space) , surgery , computed tomography , mathematics , geometry
Objective This retrospective and observational study evaluated the accuracy of a 3D virtual surgical planning (VSP) for the maxillary positioning and orientation in patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, comparing the planned and postoperative outcomes. Setting and Sample Population Seventy consecutive patients of both sexes, who were submitted to bimaxillary orthognathic surgery between 2015 and 2019 were included in our study. Material and Methods The patients were evaluated by fusing preoperative planning and postoperative outcome using cone‐beam computed tomography scan evaluation. Three‐dimensional VSP and postoperative outcomes were compared by using three linear and three angular measurements. The main outcome interest was the difference between the VSP movement, and the surgical movement obtained. The success criterion adopted was a mean linear difference of <2 mm and a mean angular difference of <4°. Results Results were analysed using a linear mixed model with fixed and random effects, at α = .05. No significant statistical differences were found for linear and angular measurements between the planned and postsurgical outcomes ( P > .05). All overlapping points presented values within the range considered clinically irrelevant (<2 mm; <1°). Conclusions Three‐dimensional VSP was executed with a high degree of accuracy. When comparing the planned and postsurgical outcomes, all overlapping points presented values within the range considered clinically irrelevant.