Premium
The Cleft Care UK study. Part 4: perceptual speech outcomes
Author(s) -
Sell D.,
Mildinhall S.,
Albery L.,
Wills A. K.,
Sandy J. R.,
Ness A. R.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
orthodontics and craniofacial research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1601-6343
pISSN - 1601-6335
DOI - 10.1111/ocr.12112
Subject(s) - audiology , speech language pathology , speech perception , medicine , audit , population , perception , optimal distinctiveness theory , intelligibility (philosophy) , workforce , psychology , otorhinolaryngology , physical therapy , philosophy , management , environmental health , epistemology , neuroscience , economic growth , economics , psychotherapist , psychiatry
Structured Abstract Objectives To describe the perceptual speech outcomes from the Cleft Care UK ( CCUK ) study and compare them to the 1998 Clinical Standards Advisory Group ( CSAG ) audit. Setting and sample population A cross‐sectional study of 248 children born with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, between 1 April 2005 and 31 March 2007 who underwent speech assessment. Materials and methods Centre‐based specialist speech and language therapists ( SLT ) took speech audio–video recordings according to nationally agreed guidelines. Two independent listeners undertook the perceptual analysis using the CAPS ‐A Audit tool. Intra‐ and inter‐rater reliability were tested. Results For each speech parameter of intelligibility/distinctiveness, hypernasality, palatal/palatalization, backed to velar/uvular, glottal, weak and nasalized consonants, and nasal realizations, there was strong evidence that speech outcomes were better in the CCUK children compared to CSAG children. The parameters which did not show improvement were nasal emission, nasal turbulence, hyponasality and lateral/lateralization. Conclusion These results suggest that centralization of cleft care into high volume centres has resulted in improvements in UK speech outcomes in five‐year‐olds with unilateral cleft lip and palate. This may be associated with the development of a specialized workforce. Nevertheless, there still remains a group of children with significant difficulties at school entry.