Premium
Intra‐arch dimensional measurement validity of laser‐scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review
Author(s) -
De Luca Canto G.,
PachêcoPereira C.,
Lagravere M. O.,
FloresMir C.,
Major P. W.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
orthodontics and craniofacial research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1601-6343
pISSN - 1601-6335
DOI - 10.1111/ocr.12068
Subject(s) - calipers , gold standard (test) , dental arch , computer science , medical physics , dentistry , arch , orthodontics , information retrieval , medicine , mathematics , radiology , archaeology , history , geometry
A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the validity of intra‐arch dimensional measurements made from laser‐scanned digital dental models in comparison with measurements directly obtained from the original plaster casts (gold standard). Finally included articles were only those reporting studies that compared measurements from digital models produced from laser scanning against their plaster models. Measurements from the original plaster models should have been made using a manual or digital caliper (gold standard). Articles that used scans from impressions or digital photographs were discarded. Detailed individual search strategies for Cochrane, EMBASE , MEDLINE , PubMed, and LILACS were developed. The references cited in the selected articles were also checked for any references that could have been missed in the electronic database searches. A partial gray literature search was undertaken using Google Scholar. The methodology of selected studies was evaluated using the 14‐item quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies ( QUADAS ). Only 16 studies were finally included for the qualitative/quantitative synthesis. The selected studies consistently agree that the validity of measurements obtained after using a laser scanner from plaster models is similar to direct measurements. Any stated differences would be unlikely clinically relevant. There is consistent scientific evidence to support the validity of measurements from digital dental models in comparison with intra‐arch dimensional measurements directly obtained from them.