Premium
Sensitive Survey Questions: Measuring Attitudes Regarding Female Genital Cutting Through a List Experiment
Author(s) -
De Cao Elisabetta,
Lutz Clemens
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
oxford bulletin of economics and statistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.131
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1468-0084
pISSN - 0305-9049
DOI - 10.1111/obes.12228
Subject(s) - female circumcision , psychology , demography , intervention (counseling) , social psychology , survey research , medicine , gynecology , applied psychology , sociology , psychiatry
Abstract Potential bias in survey responses is higher if sensitive outcomes are measured. This study analyses attitudes towards female genital cutting (FGC) in Ethiopia. A list experiment is designed to elicit truthful answers about FGC support and compares these outcomes with the answers given to a direct question. Our results confirm that the average bias is substantial as answers to direct questions underestimate the FGC support by about 10 percentage points. Moreover, our results provide suggestive but not statistically significant evidence that this bias is more pronounced among uneducated women and women targeted by an NGO intervention (not randomly assigned).