Premium
Should vitamin B 12 status be considered in assessing risk of neural tube defects?
Author(s) -
Molloy Anne M.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
annals of the new york academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.712
H-Index - 248
eISSN - 1749-6632
pISSN - 0077-8923
DOI - 10.1111/nyas.13574
Subject(s) - neural tube , folic acid , vitamin , fortification , vitamin d and neurology , environmental health , cofactor , hypovitaminosis , neural tube defect , medicine , biology , endocrinology , biochemistry , vitamin d deficiency , food science , genetics , enzyme , embryo
There is a strong biological premise for including vitamin B 12 with folic acid in strategies to prevent neural tube defects (NTDs), due to the closely interlinked metabolism of these two vitamins. For example, reduction of B 12 deficiency among women of reproductive age could enhance the capacity of folic acid to prevent NTDs by optimizing the cellular uptake and utilization of natural folate cofactors. Vitamin B 12 might also have an independent role in NTD prevention, such that adding it in fortification programs might be more effective than fortifying with folic acid alone. Globally, there is ample evidence of widespread vitamin B 12 deficiency in low‐ and middle‐income countries, but there is also considerable divergence of vitamin B 12 status across regions, likely due to genetic as well as nutritional factors. Here, I consider the evidence that low vitamin B 12 status may be an independent factor associated with risk of NTDs, and whether a fortification strategy to improve B 12 status would help reduce the prevalence of NTDs. I seek to identify knowledge gaps in this respect and specify research goals that would address these gaps.