Premium
An integrated framework of plant form and function: the belowground perspective
Author(s) -
Weigelt Alexandra,
Mommer Liesje,
Andraczek Karl,
Iversen Colleen M.,
Bergmann Joana,
Bruelheide Helge,
Fan Ying,
Freschet Grégoire T.,
GuerreroRamírez Nathaly R.,
Kattge Jens,
Kuyper Thom W.,
Laughlin Daniel C.,
Meier Ina C.,
Plas Fons,
Poorter Hendrik,
Roumet Catherine,
Ruijven Jasper,
Sabatini Francesco Maria,
Semchenko Marina,
Sweeney Christopher J.,
ValverdeBarrantes Oscar J.,
York Larry M.,
McCormack M. Luke
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/nph.17590
Subject(s) - trait , root (linguistics) , biology , plant root , gradient analysis , ecosystem , plant community , function (biology) , specific leaf area , plant species , botany , agronomy , ecology , horticulture , evolutionary biology , photosynthesis , ecological succession , philosophy , linguistics , computer science , programming language
Summary Plant trait variation drives plant function, community composition and ecosystem processes. However, our current understanding of trait variation disproportionately relies on aboveground observations. Here we integrate root traits into the global framework of plant form and function. We developed and tested an overarching conceptual framework that integrates two recently identified root trait gradients with a well‐established aboveground plant trait framework. We confronted our novel framework with published relationships between above‐ and belowground trait analogues and with multivariate analyses of above‐ and belowground traits of 2510 species. Our traits represent the leaf and root conservation gradients (specific leaf area, leaf and root nitrogen concentration, and root tissue density), the root collaboration gradient (root diameter and specific root length) and the plant size gradient (plant height and rooting depth). We found that an integrated, whole‐plant trait space required as much as four axes. The two main axes represented the fast–slow ‘conservation’ gradient on which leaf and fine‐root traits were well aligned, and the ‘collaboration’ gradient in roots. The two additional axes were separate, orthogonal plant size axes for height and rooting depth. This perspective on the multidimensional nature of plant trait variation better encompasses plant function and influence on the surrounding environment.