Premium
Mesophyll conductance: walls, membranes and spatial complexity
Author(s) -
Evans John R.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/nph.16968
Subject(s) - chloroplast , photosynthesis , conductance , rubisco , biophysics , membrane , botany , permeability (electromagnetism) , stomatal conductance , porosity , biology , cell wall , chemistry , nitrogen , biochemistry , physics , organic chemistry , gene , condensed matter physics
Summary A significant resistance to CO 2 diffusion is imposed by mesophyll tissue inside leaves. Mesophyll resistance, r m (or its reciprocal, mesophyll conductance, g m ), reduces the rate at which Rubisco can fix CO 2 , increasing the water and nitrogen costs of carbon acquisition. g m varies in proportion to the surface area of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular airspace per unit leaf area. It also depends on the thickness and effective porosity of the cell wall and the CO 2 permeabilities of membranes. As no measurements exist for the effective porosity of mesophyll cell walls, and CO 2 permeability values are too low to account for observed rates of CO 2 assimilation, conclusions from modelling must be treated with caution. There is great variation in the mesophyll resistance per unit chloroplast area for a given cell wall thickness, which may reflect differences in effective porosity. While apparent g m can vary with CO 2 and irradiance, the underlying conductance at the cellular level may remain unchanged. Dynamic changes in apparent g m arise for spatial reasons and because chloroplasts differ in their photosynthetic composition and operate in different light environments. Measurements of the temperature sensitivity of membrane CO 2 permeability are urgently needed to explain variation in temperature responses of g m .