z-logo
Premium
No evidence of homeostatic regulation of leaf temperature in Eucalyptus parramattensis trees: integration of CO 2 flux and oxygen isotope methodologies
Author(s) -
Drake John E.,
Harwood Richard,
Vårhammar Angelica,
Barbour Margaret M.,
Reich Peter B.,
Barton Craig V. M.,
Tjoelker Mark G.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/nph.16733
Subject(s) - botany , vapour pressure deficit , thermoregulation , photosynthesis , eucalyptus , biology , ecophysiology , δ13c , atmospheric sciences , chemistry , ecology , stable isotope ratio , transpiration , physics , quantum mechanics , geology
Summary Thermoregulation of leaf temperature ( T leaf ) may foster metabolic homeostasis in plants, but the degree to which T leaf is moderated, and under what environmental contexts, is a topic of debate. Isotopic studies inferred the temperature of photosynthetic carbon assimilation to be a constant value of  c . 20°C; by contrast, leaf biophysical theory suggests a strong dependence of T leaf on environmental drivers. Can this apparent disparity be reconciled? We continuously measured T leaf and whole‐crown net CO 2 uptake for Eucalyptus parramattensis trees growing in field conditions in whole‐tree chambers under ambient and +3°C warming conditions, and calculated assimilation‐weighted leaf temperature ( T L‐AW ) across 265 d, varying in air temperature ( T air ) from −1 to 45°C. We compared these data to T L‐AW derived from wood cellulose δ 18 O. T leaf exhibited substantial variation driven by T air , light intensity, and vapor pressure deficit, and T leaf was strongly linearly correlated with T air with a slope of  c.  1.0. T L‐AW values calculated from cellulose δ 18 O vs crown fluxes were remarkably consistent; both varied seasonally and in response to the warming treatment, tracking variation in T air . The leaves studied here were nearly poikilothermic, with no evidence of thermoregulation of T leaf towards a homeostatic value. Importantly, this work supports the use of cellulose δ 18 O to infer T L‐AW , but does not support the concept of strong homeothermic regulation of T leaf

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom