Premium
Canopy leaf area index at its higher end: dissection of structural controls from leaf to canopy scales in bryophytes
Author(s) -
Niinemets Ülo,
Tobias Mari
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/nph.15767
Subject(s) - canopy , leaf area index , moss , understory , biology , shoot , specific leaf area , leaf size , botany , agronomy , photosynthesis
Summary There is evidence that mosses with miniature foliage elements have extremely large leaf area index (LAI) values, but it is unclear what canopy traits are responsible for these high LAI values in architecturally divergent mosses, and how the inherent trade‐offs limiting maximum LAI in vascular plants can be overcome in mosses. To determine the quantitative significance of different traits in determining LAI, we developed a method to dissect LAI into underlying functionally dependent constituent traits at leaf, shoot and canopy scales. The suites of structural traits were studied altogether for 43 moss canopies from 11 species with contrasting light and water requirements along gap‐understory gradients to obtain as large a range of variation in moss architecture as possible and evaluate the differentiation in moss LAI in relation to species ecology. Extensive variation in moss structural traits, 11‐ (shoot length) to 77‐fold (shoot number per area,N S ¯ ), was observed at all structural scales from leaf to canopy. However, LAI only varied nine‐fold, as the result of two key trade‐offs: leaf size vs number trade‐off and shoot leaf area vs shoot density trade‐off. Owing to these negative relationships, and greater variability inN S ¯ , LAI primarily scaled withN S ¯ .N S ¯ and LAI increased with site light availability, and LAI was greater in open and dry habitat species. This study highlights a huge structural diversity among moss canopies, but indicates that canopies converge to a much narrower range of LAI due to trait trade‐offs such that, counterintuitively, minute leaf size and densely leafed stems are not necessarily responsible for high LAI in mosses.