z-logo
Premium
Conservation vs divergence in LEAFY and APETALA1 functions between Arabidopsis thaliana and Cardamine hirsuta
Author(s) -
Monniaux Marie,
McKim Sarah M.,
Cartolano Maria,
Théve Emmanuel,
Parcy François,
Tsiantis Miltos,
Hay Angela
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/nph.14419
Subject(s) - leafy , biology , arabidopsis thaliana , botany , homeotic gene , mutant , arabidopsis , meristem , gene , genetics , shoot
Summary A conserved genetic toolkit underlies the development of diverse floral forms among angiosperms. However, the degree of conservation vs divergence in the configuration of these gene regulatory networks is less clear. We addressed this question in a parallel genetic study between the closely related species Arabidopsis thaliana and Cardamine hirsuta . We identified leafy ( lfy ) and apetala1 ( ap1 ) alleles in a mutant screen for floral regulators in C. hirsuta . C. hirsuta lfy mutants showed a complete homeotic conversion of flowers to leafy shoots, mimicking lfy ap1 double mutants in A. thaliana . Through genetic and molecular experiments, we showed that AP 1 activation is fully dependent on LFY in C. hirsuta , by contrast to A. thaliana . Additionally, we found that LFY influences heteroblasty in C. hirsuta , such that loss or gain of LFY function affects its progression. Overexpression of UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS also alters C. hirsuta leaf shape in an LFY ‐dependent manner. We found that LFY and AP 1 are conserved floral regulators that act nonredundantly in C. hirsuta , such that LFY has more obvious roles in floral and leaf development in C. hirsuta than in A. thaliana .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here