z-logo
Premium
Cryptospores and cryptophytes reveal hidden diversity in early land floras
Author(s) -
Edwards Dianne,
Morris Jennifer L.,
Richardson John B.,
Kenrick Paul
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/nph.12645
Subject(s) - sporangium , biology , devonian , extant taxon , plant evolution , botany , pennsylvanian , clade , ordovician , ecology , evolutionary biology , phylogenetics , spore , paleontology , biochemistry , structural basin , genome , gene
Summary Cryptospores, recovered from Ordovician through Devonian rocks, differ from trilete spores in possessing distinctive configurations (i.e. hilate monads, dyads, and permanent tetrads). Their affinities are contentious, but knowledge of their relationships is essential to understanding the nature of the earliest land flora. This review brings together evidence about the source plants, mostly obtained from spores extracted from minute, fragmented, yet exceptionally anatomically preserved fossils. We coin the term ‘cryptophytes’ for plants that produced the cryptospores and show them to have been simple terrestrial organisms of short stature (i.e. millimetres high). Two lineages are currently recognized. Partitatheca shows a combination of characters (e.g. spo‐rophyte bifurcation, stomata, and dyads) unknown in plants today. Lenticulatheca encompasses discoidal sporangia containing monads formed from dyads with ultrastructure closer to that of higher plants, as exemplified by Cooksonia . Other emerging groupings are less well characterized, and their precise affinities to living clades remain unclear. Some may be stem group embryophytes or tracheophytes. Others are more closely related to the bryophytes, but they are not bryophytes as defined by extant representatives. Cryptophytes encompass a pool of diversity from which modern bryophytes and vascular plants emerged, but were competitively replaced by early tracheophytes. Sporogenesis always produced either dyads or tetrads, indicating strict genetic control. The long‐held consensus that tetrads were the archetypal condition in land plants is challenged.ContentsSummary 50 I. Introduction 50 II. History, characters and disparity in cryptospores 52 III. In situ cryptospores 53 IV. Evolutionary overview 66 V. Variation in the meiotic process 71 VI. Spore wall formation and the nature of the envelope 72 VII. Conclusions 74Acknowledgements 75References 75

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here