Premium
Evaluating theories of drought‐induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel–experiment framework
Author(s) -
McDowell Nate G.,
Fisher Rosie A.,
Xu Chonggang,
Domec J. C.,
Hölttä Teemu,
Mackay D. Scott,
Sperry John S.,
Boutz Amanda,
Dickman Lee,
Gehres Nathan,
Limousin Jean Marc,
Macalady Alison,
MartínezVilalta Jordi,
Mencuccini Maurizio,
Plaut Jennifer A.,
Ogée Jérôme,
Pangle Robert E.,
Rasse Daniel P.,
Ryan Michael G.,
Sevanto Sanna,
Waring Richard H.,
Williams A. Park,
Yepez Enrico A.,
Pockman William T.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/nph.12465
Subject(s) - vegetation (pathology) , woodland , ecology , environmental science , range (aeronautics) , empirical modelling , juniper , ecosystem , biology , computer science , medicine , materials science , pathology , composite material , programming language
Summary Model–data comparisons of plant physiological processes provide an understanding of mechanisms underlying vegetation responses to climate. We simulated the physiology of a piñon pine–juniper woodland ( Pinus edulis–Juniperus monosperma ) that experienced mortality during a 5 yr precipitation‐reduction experiment, allowing a framework with which to examine our knowledge of drought‐induced tree mortality. We used six models designed for scales ranging from individual plants to a global level, all containing state‐of‐the‐art representations of the internal hydraulic and carbohydrate dynamics of woody plants. Despite the large range of model structures, tuning, and parameterization employed, all simulations predicted hydraulic failure and carbon starvation processes co‐occurring in dying trees of both species, with the time spent with severe hydraulic failure and carbon starvation, rather than absolute thresholds per se , being a better predictor of impending mortality. Model and empirical data suggest that limited carbon and water exchanges at stomatal, phloem, and below‐ground interfaces were associated with mortality of both species. The model–data comparison suggests that the introduction of a mechanistic process into physiology‐based models provides equal or improved predictive power over traditional process‐model or empirical thresholds. Both biophysical and empirical modeling approaches are useful in understanding processes, particularly when the models fail, because they reveal mechanisms that are likely to underlie mortality. We suggest that for some ecosystems, integration of mechanistic pathogen models into current vegetation models, and evaluation against observations, could result in a breakthrough capability to simulate vegetation dynamics.ContentsSummary 305 I. Background 305 II. Model–experiment approach 306 III. Simulations of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation 310 IV. On thresholds vs duration of stress as drivers of mortality 311 V. Interdependence of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation 314 VI. Next‐generation, traditional, and empirical models 316 VII. A path forward 317 VIII. Conclusions 318Acknowledgements 318References 318