z-logo
Premium
Ontogenetic shifts in plant interactions vary with environmental severity and affect population structure
Author(s) -
Roux Peter C.,
Shaw Justine D.,
Chown Steven L.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1111/nph.12349
Subject(s) - biology , facilitation , ecology , competition (biology) , population , interspecific competition , alpine plant , population size , environmental change , intraspecific competition , habitat , climate change , demography , neuroscience , sociology
Summary Environmental conditions and plant size may both alter the outcome of inter‐specific plant–plant interactions, with seedlings generally facilitated more strongly than larger individuals in stressful habitats. However, the combined impact of plant size and environmental severity on interactions is poorly understood. Here, we tested explicitly for the first time the hypothesis that ontogenetic shifts in interactions are delayed under increasingly severe conditions by examining the interaction between a grass, Agrostis magellanica , and a cushion plant, Azorella selago , along two severity gradients. The impact of A. selago on A. magellanica abundance, but not reproductive effort, was related to A. magellanica size, with a trend for delayed shifts towards more negative interactions under greater environmental severity. Intermediate‐sized individuals were most strongly facilitated, leading to differences in the size‐class distribution of A. magellanica on the soil and on A. selago . The A. magellanica size‐class distribution was more strongly affected by A. selago than by environmental severity, demonstrating that the plant–plant interaction impacts A. magellanica population structure more strongly than habitat conditions. As ontogenetic shifts in plant–plant interactions cannot be assumed to be constant across severity gradients and may impact species population structure, studies examining the outcome of interactions need to consider the potential for size‐ or age‐related variation in competition and facilitation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here