Premium
The nutrient‐sensing repertoires of mouse enterochromaffin cells differ between duodenum and colon
Author(s) -
Martin A. M.,
Lumsden A. L.,
Young R. L.,
Jessup C. F.,
Spencer N. J.,
Keating D. J.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
neurogastroenterology and motility
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.489
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1365-2982
pISSN - 1350-1925
DOI - 10.1111/nmo.13046
Subject(s) - enterochromaffin cell , duodenum , gastroenterology , medicine , biology , serotonin , receptor
Background Enterochromaffin ( EC ) cells within the gastrointestinal ( GI ) tract provide almost all body serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine [5‐ HT ]). Peripheral 5‐ HT , released from EC cells lining the gut wall, serves diverse physiological roles. These include modulating GI motility, bone formation, hepatic gluconeogenesis, thermogenesis, insulin resistance, and regulation of fat mass. Enterochromaffin cells are nutrient sensors, but which nutrients they are responsive to and how this changes in different parts of the GI tract are poorly understood. Methods To accurately undertake such an examination, we undertook the first isolation and purification of primary mouse EC cells from both the duodenum and colon in the same animal. This allowed us to compare, in an internally controlled manner, regional differences in the expression of nutrient sensors in EC cells using real‐time PCR . Key Results Both colonic and duodenal EC cells expressed G protein‐coupled receptors and facilitative transporters for sugars, free fatty acids, amino acids, and lipid amides. We find differential expression of nutrient receptor and transporters in EC cells obtained from duodenal and colonic EC cells. Duodenal EC cells have higher expression of tryptophan hydroxylase‐1, sugar transporters GLUT 2, GLUT 5, and free fatty acid receptors 1 and 3 ( FFAR 1 and FFAR 3). Colonic EC cells express higher levels of GLUT 1, FFAR 2, and FFAR 4. Conclusions & Inferences We highlight the diversity of EC cell physiology and identify differences in the regional sensing repertoire of EC cells to an assortment of nutrients. These data indicate that not all EC cells are similar and that differences in their physiological responses are likely dependent on their location within the GI tract.