z-logo
Premium
Reproducibility of high‐definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high‐resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence
Author(s) -
Chakraborty S.,
Feuerhak K. J.,
Zinsmeister A. R.,
Bharucha A. E.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
neurogastroenterology and motility
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.489
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1365-2982
pISSN - 1350-1925
DOI - 10.1111/nmo.12950
Subject(s) - reproducibility , medicine , concordance , anorectal manometry , fecal incontinence , high resolution manometry , confidence interval , urology , nuclear medicine , surgery , defecation , reflux , statistics , mathematics , disease
Background While widely used in clinical practice, the reproducibility of high‐definition anorectal manometry ( HD ‐ ARM ) remains unclear. We evaluated the intra‐individual reproducibility of HD ‐ ARM and compared pressures measured with HD ‐ ARM and high‐resolution anorectal manometry ( HR ‐ ARM ). Methods Thirty‐six women with fecal incontinence had an initial HD ‐ ARM ( HD ‐ ARM 1); on the same day, after randomization, 21 had a second ( HD ‐ ARM 2). Sixteen women had a third ( HD ‐ ARM 3) 4 weeks later. Twenty‐five had also been evaluated by HR ‐ ARM previously. Rectoanal pressures were assessed at rest, during squeeze and simulated evacuation. Concordance among pressures was assessed with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient ( CCC ). Key Results Anal resting and squeeze pressures measured with HD ‐ ARM were reproducible on the same and different days; for average resting pressures of HD ‐ ARM 1 vs HD ‐ ARM 2, CCC  = 0.73 (95% confidence interval [ CI ]: 0.53–0.94), and for HD ‐ ARM 1 vs HD ‐ ARM 3, CCC  = 0.60 (95% CI : 0.28–0.93). For maximum squeeze pressures of HD ‐ ARM 1 vs HD ‐ ARM 2, CCC  = 0.86 (95% CI : 0.75–0.97), and for HD ‐ ARM 1 vs HD ‐ ARM 3, CCC  = 0.56 (95% CI : 0.21–0.91). The rectoanal gradient during evacuation was significantly concordant between HD ‐ ARM 1 and HD ‐ ARM 2 but not HD ‐ ARM 1 and HD ‐ ARM 3. Resting ( CCC  = 0.38 [95% CI : 0.14–0.62]) and squeeze pressures ( CCC  = 0.73 [95% CI : 0.57–0.89]) measured with HD ‐ ARM 1 and HR ‐ ARM were also concordant. Conclusions & Inferences Among women with fecal incontinence, measurements with HD ‐ ARM were reproducible on the same (anal resting and squeeze pressures and rectoanal gradient during evacuation) and different days (anal resting and squeeze pressures) and correlated with HR ‐ ARM measurements. These findings support use of HD ‐ ARM and HR ‐ ARM for longitudinal assessments of anal resting and squeeze pressures.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom