Premium
The effect of arabinoxylooligosaccharides on gastric sensory‐motor function and nutrient tolerance in man
Author(s) -
Scarpellini E.,
Deloose E.,
Vos R.,
Francois I. E. J. A.,
Delcour J. A.,
Broekaert W. F.,
Verbeke K.,
Tack J.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
neurogastroenterology and motility
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.489
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1365-2982
pISSN - 1350-1925
DOI - 10.1111/nmo.12819
Subject(s) - maltodextrin , postprandial , food science , arabinoxylan , medicine , meal , chemistry , biochemistry , polysaccharide , insulin , organic chemistry , spray drying
Background Intestinal microbiota regulates gastrointestinal sensory‐motor function. Prebiotics such as arabinoxylan‐oligosaccharide ( AXOS ) are non‐digestible, fermentable food ingredients beneficially affecting intestinal microbiota, colon activity, and improving human health. We wanted to investigate whether acute AXOS or maltodextrin (placebo) administration may alter gastric sensitivity ( GS ), accommodation ( GA ), nutrient tolerance ( NT ) in man. Methods Thirteen HV (6 M, 32.2 ± 1.8 years; BMI 22.3 ± 0.2) underwent two 48 h treatment periods with oral 4 × 9.4 g AXOS or 4 × 10 g maltodextrin (at least 1 week wash‐out) for gastric barostat assessment of GS , gastric compliance ( GC ), GA to a liquid test meal, on day 1, and NT drink test, on day 2. Oro‐cecal transit‐time ( OCTT ), colonic fermentation ( CF ) were assessed simultaneously with 13 C‐lactose ureide, H 2 breath tests. Key Results Arabinoxylan‐oligosaccharide significantly increased CF on day 1 and 2 (565 ± 272 vs 100 ± 24, 365 ± 66 vs 281 ± 25 H2 ppm/min, AXOS vs maltodextrin, both p < 0.05), not the OCTT . AXOS did not alter GC , sensitivity before and after the meal. Gastric accommodation was not significantly influenced by AXOS (volume increment: 171 ± 33 vs 130 ± 28 mL, AXOS vs maltodextrin, p = NS ). On day 1, AXOS fermentation was associated with significantly higher postprandial bloating scores (960 ± 235 vs 396 ± 138 mm*min, AXOS vs maltodextrin, p < 0.05). On day 2, AXOS did not affect maximal NT (946 ± 102 vs 894 ± 97 mL, AXOS vs maltodextrin, p = NS ), increased the bloating score (1236 ± 339 vs 675 ± 197 mm*min, AXOS vs maltodextrin, p < 0.05). Conclusions & Inferences Acute AXOS administration, associated with increased CF , does not affect GA , is not associated with increased meal‐induced satiety or perception scores.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom