Premium
Comparison of resting energy equations and total energy expenditure in haemodialysis patients and body composition measured by multi‐frequency bioimpedance
Author(s) -
Oliveira Ben,
Sridharan Sivakumar,
Farrington Ken,
Davenport Andrew
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
nephrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1440-1797
pISSN - 1320-5358
DOI - 10.1111/nep.13112
Subject(s) - resting energy expenditure , medicine , dialysis , total energy expenditure , zoology , energy expenditure , energy metabolism , hemodialysis , composition (language) , basal metabolic rate , urology , endocrinology , linguistics , philosophy , biology
Aim Waste products of metabolism are retained in haemodialysis ( HD ) patients. Cellular metabolism generates energy, and patients with greater energy expenditure may therefore require more dialysis. The aim of the present study was to determine the amount of dialysis required, to determine equations estimating the required resting and total energy expenditure ( REE , TEE ). Methods Estimates of REE in HD patients were compared using established equations with a novel equation recently validated in HD patients ( HD equation). TEE was derived from REE ( HD equation) and estimates of physical activity obtained by questionnaire. REE and TEE relationships with bioimpedance measured body composition were then determined. Results A total of 317 HD patients were studied: 195 males (61.5%), 123 diabetic (38.9%), mean age 65.0 ± 15.3 and weight 73.1 ± 16.8 kg. REE from HD E quation was 1509 ± 241 kcal/day, which was greater than for Mifflin St Joer 1384 ± 259, Harris‐Benedict 1437 ± 244, Katch‐ McA rdle 1345 ± 232 (all P < 0.05 vs. HD E quation), but less than Cunningham 1557 ± 236 kcal/day. Bland–Altman mean bias ranged from −263 to 55 kcal/day. TEE was 1727 (1558–1976) kcal/day, and on multi‐variable analysis was positively associated with skeletal muscle mass (β 23.3, P < 0.001), employment (β 406.5, P < 0.001), low co‐morbidity (β 105.1, P = 0.006), and protein nitrogen appearance (β 2.7, P = 0.015), and negatively with age (β −7.9, P < 0.001), and dialysis vintage (β −121.2, P = 0.002). Conclusions Most standard equations underestimate REE in HD patients compared to the HD E quation. TEE was greater in those with higher skeletal muscle mass and protein nitrogen appearance, lower co‐morbidity, age, and dialysis vintage, and the employed. More metabolically active patients may require greater dialytic clearances.