Premium
Nationalism and revolution: friends or foes?
Author(s) -
Kumar Krishan
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
nations and nationalism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.655
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1469-8129
pISSN - 1354-5078
DOI - 10.1111/nana.12135
Subject(s) - nationalism , modernity , unification , sociology , political economy , political science , law , aesthetics , politics , philosophy , computer science , programming language
Nationalism and revolution have generally been held to go together. Many nation‐states have had their origins in revolution, from the A mericans in the 18th century to a host of T hird W orld nation‐states in the 20th century. Generally, both modern revolutions and modern nationalism have the same origins, in 18th century E nlightenment thought. But this paper argues that, despite this common origin, the principles of revolution and nationalism are divergent, and can set one against the other. Revolutions emphasise freedom and equality; nationalism emphasises integration and unification. These principles can clash, though not inevitably and not always. The paper examines the 1789 F rench R evolution, the 1848 revolutions and the 1917 R ussian revolution. It shows that in the first two cases, revolutionary aspirations came up against and were eventually displaced by nationalist aims. In the case of 1917, revolution paradoxically, and unintentionally, institutionalised nationalism. These examples show that, though linked at some high level of modern thought, revolution and nationalism express different and at times divergent strands of modernity.